Peer effects and social preferences in voluntary cooperation: A theoretical and experimental analysis
نویسندگان
چکیده
Social preferences and social influence effects (‘‘peer effects’’) are well documented, but little is known about how peers shape social preferences. Settings where social preferences matter are often situations where peer effects are likely too. In a gift-exchange experiment with independent payoffs between two agents we find causal evidence for peer effects. Efforts are positively correlated but with a kink: agents follow a low-performing but not a high-performing peer. This contradicts major theories of social preferences which predict that efforts are unrelated, or negatively related. Some theories allow for positively-related efforts but cannot explain most observations. Conformism, norm following and social esteem are candidate explanations. 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CCBY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
منابع مشابه
Peer Effects and Social Preferences in Voluntary Cooperation
Substantial evidence suggests the behavioral relevance of social preferences and also the importance of social influence effects (“peer effects”). Yet, little is known about how peer effects and social preferences are related. In a three-person gift-exchange experiment we find causal evidence for peer effects in voluntary cooperation: agents’ efforts are positively related despite the absence o...
متن کاملStrategic interaction on Liquidity Risk in Iranian Banks
The peer effects induced by social interactions have been studied empirically for several socio-economic phenomena in the last three decades. Before, economists have considered preferences of actors as exogenous parameters which are a tradition rooted in the work of Milton Friedman. But most recently, many economists have studied processes of preference formation of actors and have developed th...
متن کاملPublic Goods Agreements with Other‐regarding Preferences
Stimulation of cooperation when noncooperation appears to be individually rational has been an issue in economics for at least a half century. In the 1960's and 1970's the context was cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma game; in the 1980's voluntary provision of public goods; in the 1990's, the literature on coalition formation for public goods provision emerged, in the context of coalitions ...
متن کاملReciprocity, Matching and Conditional Cooperation in Two Public Goods Games
Experimental and empirical evidence identifies social preferences and proposes competing models of such preferences. We find that participants match the contributions of others in the voluntary contribution mechanism (VCM). We also examine a game with different equilibria, the weakest link mechanism (WLM). Here, in contrast, participants match the minimum contribution of others. D 2004 Elsevier...
متن کاملOn Modeling Voluntary Contributions to Public Goods
This paper addresses four stylized facts that summarize data from experimental studies of voluntary contributions to provision of public goods. Theoretical propositions and testable hypotheses for voluntary contributions are derived from two models of social preferences, the inequity aversion model and the egocentric other-regarding preferences model. We nd that the egocentric other-regardin...
متن کامل